Why I Never Chase a Lead Who Ghosts Me

I have leads who come to me every single day for coaching, for a second opinion, to rebuild an ads account so they can finally manage it themselves. And if a lead ghosts me? I never follow up.

Read that again, because I know exactly how it sounds. Egotistical. Condescending. Like I don’t need the business. That is not the point of this post, and it’s not how I actually think about my pipeline. I want to explain why I run my business this way, because it says a lot more about how I think about Google Ads than it does about sales.

You already know the problems in the Google Ads industry — I’ve written about them more times than I can count.

Agencies with more salespeople than PPC managers. Retainers priced to keep you confused instead of profitable. I’m not rehashing that today in my post. Instead, I want to talk about the other side of it: why I don’t chase, and why I believe the best clients are the ones I never have to follow up with in the first place.

Templating Is the Death of PPC

Here is the thing I firmly believe: templating and repetitive processes are the death of PPC. I have been argued with about my stance here.

I don’t care if I’ve worked with fifty other clients in your exact industry. I am never templating my approach to your Google Ads account. I’m not building you a brand campaign just because a brand campaign happened to work for someone in a similar space. I’m looking at your campaigns, your goals, and what you actually tell me about your business, and I’m tailoring the ads strategy to that.

I look at the auction insights, I look at if you should be bidding for impression share or max conversions.

Part of why this matters so much to me: I teach clients to run their own ads. That means the person across the table needs the mental bandwidth, the available mental load, and the right mindset to actually make it work. Not everyone has that available to them right now — and that’s not a judgment, it’s just true.

The Leads That Feel Too Good to Be True

Here’s what I’ve noticed. Sometimes I get off a discovery call thinking, this person is the best lead I’ve had in months. Somebody referred them. They practically typed their exact scenario into ChatGPT and it spat out my name. We click instantly on the call. And those, more often than not, are the exact leads who never call me back.

I used to find that frustrating.

Now I mostly think: maybe the universe is telling me something didn’t quite align. Not chasing that lead down, not trying to talk them into it, is how I protect the integrity of the clients I do get and who do hire me. If I have to convince you, you’re probably not ready for how I actually work — and that’s a bigger problem than a lost sale at the end of the day.

What Alignment Actually Looks Like

Here’s a real example of what that alignment looks like day to day.

I have a client running Google Ads right now with multiple phone call conversions showing — a phone call click, meaning someone came from the ad to the website and tapped to call, plus some call tracking inherited from their old Google Analytics setup.

When I looked at the account, the volume is low enough that it’s genuinely unclear whether those two signals are duplicating each other. That’s a classic conversion-tracking problem hiding underneath what looks like a simple tracking question.

My honest opinion: I don’t love this setup. But this client told me the phone is ringing more and they haven’t seen a dip in business.

So instead of ripping out the tracking while we’re still early, we’re doing something harder — we’re choosing to read the signal instead of reacting to the noise.

We know the numbers might be duplicative. We’re watching them move in the right direction instead of trusting them as an absolute truth.

That takes a specific kind of thinking. It takes being okay in the middle ground instead of demanding perfection. And most people are not prepared for that when they get into Google Ads.

If I had chased down that ghosted lead — followed up three or four times, tried to talk them into working with me — I might have said things in the pursuit that don’t actually reflect how I think.

This client, on the other hand, is close to a perfect fit. We talk every week. He understands how his campaign is built end to end, and he’s genuinely comfortable with directional data instead of demanding a certainty that doesn’t exist yet.

PPC in 2026 Can’t Be About Perfection

PPC in 2026 cannot be about perfection, because none of us control the algorithm.

What we can control are the inputs. In this case, we gave the account the best inputs we had — and the phone tracking might get streamlined once we have enough data to know which signal to trust. For now, we’re sorting through the truth in real time. That’s not a flaw in the process. That is the process.

If you’re looking for a consultant who’s going to convince you to work together, that’s not me.

I’d rather have five clients who feel matched enough to reach back out on their own than fifty who showed up because I chased them into becoming the wrong clients.

If you want someone who tells you the truth about your account, sits in the uncertainty with you, and builds a strategy around your actual business instead of a template — that’s the fit I’m looking for too.

Sarah Stemen

Bio written by Sarah Stemen

Sarah Stemen is your leading resource for PPC help and AI-powered campaign optimization. As the President of the Paid Search Association (PSA) and a globally recognized Top 100 PPC Strategist, she leverages her 17 years of Google Ads experience to deliver enterprise-level strategy and audits that generate 30%+ ROI improvements. A trusted contributor to Search Engine Land and Search Engine Journal, Sarah's insights are frequently shared on industry podcasts, YouTube, and Reddit. Find her data-driven strategy at thesarahstemen.com.

https://www.thesarahstemen.com
Next
Next

The Anatomy of a Pattern-Interrupt: What AI Can’t Optimize for in Google Ads Copy